Bob Mottram il y a 6 ans
Parent
révision
95acebdc94
2 fichiers modifiés avec 3 ajouts et 3 suppressions
  1. 1
    1
      doc/EN/faq.org
  2. 2
    2
      website/EN/faq.html

+ 1
- 1
doc/EN/faq.org Voir le fichier

@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ This system tries to block port scanners. Any other system trying to scan for op
143 143
 * Should I upload my GPG keys to keybase.io?
144 144
 It's not recommended unless there exists some compelling reason for you to be on there. That site asks users to upload the *private keys*, and even if the keys are client side encrypted with a passphrase there's always the chance that there will be a data leak in future and letter agencies will then have a full time opportunity to crack the passphrases.
145 145
 
146
-Saying something resembling /"only noobs will use crackable private key passphrases"/ isn't good enough. A passphrase should not be considered to be a substitute for a private key.
146
+Saying something resembling "/only noobs will use crackable private key passphrases/" isn't good enough. A passphrase should not be considered to be a substitute for a private key.
147 147
 * Keys and emails should not be stored on servers. Why do you do that?
148 148
 Ordinarily this is good advice. However, the threat model for a device in your home is different from the one for a generic server in a massive warehouse. Compare and contrast:
149 149
 

+ 2
- 2
website/EN/faq.html Voir le fichier

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
4 4
 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
5 5
 <head>
6 6
 <title></title>
7
-<!-- 2018-06-16 Sat 21:22 -->
7
+<!-- 2018-06-16 Sat 21:40 -->
8 8
 <meta  http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
9 9
 <meta  name="generator" content="Org-mode" />
10 10
 <meta  name="author" content="Bob Mottram" />
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ It's not recommended unless there exists some compelling reason for you to be on
542 542
 </p>
543 543
 
544 544
 <p>
545
-Saying something resembling /"only noobs will use crackable private key passphrases"/ isn't good enough. A passphrase should not be considered to be a substitute for a private key.
545
+Saying something resembling "<i>only noobs will use crackable private key passphrases</i>" isn't good enough. A passphrase should not be considered to be a substitute for a private key.
546 546
 </p>
547 547
 </div>
548 548
 </div>