10 年前 · 1aeef0ff0c
--- a/doc/faq.org
+++ b/doc/faq.org
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 
				 #+END_CENTER
			
 
				 
			
 
				 * Why not supply a disk image download?
			
 
				-Shipping a Freedombone disk image ready to install on a flash disk would be easy, but disk images are relatively opaque. It would be quite easy to hide something nasty within a disk image and the user might never know. To guard against that possibility installing via the /install-freedombone.sh/ script is a lot more transparent. You can check the code to see exactly what it's doing, and the packages are all downloaded from standard Debian repos (you can even choose which one you trust) or git repos. Doing it this way the system is fully auditable, whereas when shipping a disk image it's harder to be confident that no nefarious extras have been added.
			
 
				+Shipping a Freedombone disk image ready to install on a flash disk would be easy, but disk images are relatively opaque. It would be quite easy to hide something nasty within a disk image and the user might never know. To guard against that possibility installing via the *freedombone* command is a lot more transparent, since it's really just a bash script. You can check the script code to see exactly what it's doing, and the packages are all downloaded from standard Debian repos (you can even choose which one you trust) or git repos. Doing it this way the system is fully auditable, whereas when shipping a disk image it's harder to be confident that no nefarious extras have been added.
			
 
				 * Is metadata protected?
			
 
				 Even when using Freedombone metadata analysis by third parties is still possible. They might have a much harder time knowing what the content is, but they can potentially construct extensive dossiers based upon who communicated with your server when.  Metadata leakage is a general problem with most current web systems and it is hoped that more secure technology will become available in future. But for now if metadata protection is your main concern using Freedombone won't help.
			
 
				 * Why isn't dynamic DNS working?
			
--- a/website/faq.html
+++ b/website/faq.html
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
				 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
			
 
				 <head>
			
 
				 <title></title>
			
 
				-<!-- 2015-01-21 Wed 20:35 -->
			
 
				+<!-- 2015-01-21 Wed 20:41 -->
			
 
				 <meta  http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
			
 
				 <meta  name="generator" content="Org-mode" />
			
 
				 <meta  name="author" content="Bob Mottram" />
			
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ for the JavaScript code in this tag.
 
				 <h2 id="unnumbered-1">Why not supply a disk image download?</h2>
			
 
				 <div class="outline-text-2" id="text-unnumbered-1">
			
 
				 <p>
			
 
				-Shipping a Freedombone disk image ready to install on a flash disk would be easy, but disk images are relatively opaque. It would be quite easy to hide something nasty within a disk image and the user might never know. To guard against that possibility installing via the <i>install-freedombone.sh</i> script is a lot more transparent. You can check the code to see exactly what it's doing, and the packages are all downloaded from standard Debian repos (you can even choose which one you trust) or git repos. Doing it this way the system is fully auditable, whereas when shipping a disk image it's harder to be confident that no nefarious extras have been added.
			
 
				+Shipping a Freedombone disk image ready to install on a flash disk would be easy, but disk images are relatively opaque. It would be quite easy to hide something nasty within a disk image and the user might never know. To guard against that possibility installing via the <b>freedombone</b> command is a lot more transparent, since it's really just a bash script. You can check the script code to see exactly what it's doing, and the packages are all downloaded from standard Debian repos (you can even choose which one you trust) or git repos. Doing it this way the system is fully auditable, whereas when shipping a disk image it's harder to be confident that no nefarious extras have been added.
			
 
				 </p>
			
 
				 </div>
			
 
				 </div>